Can Anyone Make Abstract Art? A Personal Perspective
The question “Can anyone make abstract art” has been debated almost as much as the meaning and value of abstract art itself.
With its lack of recognisable forms and focus on colour, line, shape and emotion, abstract art seems to lift the curtain on the creative process itself. Is talent required or is unfettered imagination enough?
While almost anyone can create an abstract composition, the most revered works demonstrate how artistic skill and vision can transcend materials to create deeply affecting experiences.
The controversy around abstract art has simmered for over a century, with critics dismissing it as empty and meaningless while proponents exalt its abandoning of constraints.
The argument that “anyone can make abstract art” stems from a perception that without the goals of mimicking reality or conveying history or meaning, pure abstraction is more random and requires less ability.
However, while abstract art does free artists from concrete objectives and opens the door for instinctual, subconscious creation, mastery of materials, composition and concept is still required to produce gallery-worthy artwork that connects with viewers and stands the test of time.
Developing a compelling abstract visual language asks as much of artists as any classical training—influenced by but not ruled by nature, the best abstract artists balance creative freedom with intentionality and discipline.
In this blog, I would like to discuss and highlight the issue surrounding the debate asking “Can anyone make abstract art.” This question often arises when examining abstract art and who has the ability to create it.
Some argue that abstract art requires no formal training, and therefore anyone with basic materials can make abstract art.
Others contend that there is more subtlety and skill involved than may be visible to the untrained eye.
As we analyse examples of abstract art and hear perspectives from various artists and critics, we must consider factors like intent, emotion evocation, design principles and reception.
Getting to the heart of “Can anyone make abstract art” raises compelling questions about the nature of art itself.
What qualities make art or an artist elevated and exceptional rather than amateurish?
Does abstract art’s lack of recognisable subject matter and focus on colour, shape and form open the door for beginners to participate more easily?
Or is there a sophisticated eye and sense of expression needed to execute this vision successfully?
My goal is not to provide any definitive answer here, but to explore the nuances of this debate to better understand and appreciate abstract art.
What is Abstract Art?
Abstract Art Definition
Abstract art seeks to capture an idea, emotion or process rather than depict a reality. It utilises colour, shape, line and form to convey meaning freed from visual references we see in the world.
As I covered in-depth in my blog “What is Abstract Art,” abstraction in art abandons perspective, scale and other mimetic techniques to focus on essential elements that trigger felt responses over-identification.
It allows free association and interpretation by the viewer based on their own experiences.
Abstract Art Brief History
The questioning of realism and objectivity in art began over 100 years ago with experiments that challenged the limitations of traditional painting and sculpture.
Pioneers like Hilma af Klint, Wassily Kandinsky and Kazimir Malevich began using abstract geometric shapes and compositions to symbolise their interests.
Later movements used gestural techniques, fields of colour and graphic elements to further abstraction’s ability to directly impress feelings on the viewer.
Major abstract artists like Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and Helen Frankenthaler inspired subsequent generations by taking abstraction in radical new directions.
Differences from Representational Art
Unlike traditional visual art seeking to represent reality and communicate narrative content, abstract art avoids reference to the natural world in favour of elements with less defined associations.
Space is ambiguous or flattened; colour and shape have symbolic over descriptive roles. Materials are not limited by how accurately they capture appearances.
Abstraction grants freedom to suggest concepts and emotions directly. But not having an image to focus on also deprives viewers of an entry point, making consensus on meaning more elusive.
Why is Abstract Art Controversial?
By design, abstract art tends to be polarising – often admired for its originality but also seen as puzzling or pointless. At the root of objections is often the question “Can anyone make abstract art?”
As I’ve explored in other blogs like “Abstract Art Myths“, “Is Abstract Art Real Art“, “Is Abstract Art Random” and “Is Abstract Art Easy” abstraction is sometimes dismissed as overly subjective, reliant mainly on impulse rather than mastery.
Rebutting this argument for the legitimacy and difficulty of practising abstraction has been necessary over decades marked by incredulity over acclaimed creations by artists like Cy Twombly, Anish Kapoor, Agnes Martin and Brice Marden.
Evaluating an abstract work remains slippery – it should rely less on preconceived standards yet still exhibit coherence and intent if it is to be called art rather than accident.
Arguments: Anyone Can Make Abstract Art
There are several common arguments made for why “anyone can make abstract art”:
- Abstract art is about pure expression and imagination
Unlike traditional representative art, abstract art does not require an accurate depiction of people, places or things from objective reality.
By using colour, shape and medium inventively, abstraction prioritises accessing the inner world of emotion and imagination.
Iconic artists like Elaine de Kooning, Joan Miró and Lee Krasner created highly-regarded works based on their feelings and stream of consciousness rather than observational skills.
Similarly, my intuitive experimentation with Gesturalism led to notable paintings without relying on advanced techniques.
Through a process of spontaneous creation and an unrestrained approach, I produced works that achieved a sense of energy and freedom. Rather than precise brushstrokes, I used bold, sweeping motions to evoke emotion and convey a personal style.
While formal training provides valuable skills, I found power in abstraction and prioritised capturing a feeling over achieving anatomical perfection.
My goal was not mastery within a movement, but pure expression translated directly from mind to canvas. By following an internal creative voice without overthinking technique, I produced paintings with qualities that resonated with audiences.
I have included some of my abstract paintings in this article.
Since abstract art emphasises creative vision over realistic representation, it’s easier for amateurs to produce original compositions.
- There are no right or wrong interpretations
When viewing abstract art, everyone can have an opinion on meaning and success because it’s so subjective.
Without a concrete point of reference, viewers project their own ideas and experiences onto the canvas. There’s no right or wrong way to interpret an abstract composition like Mark Rothko’s colour field paintings or Jackson Pollock’s splatter paintings.
Some of my abstract oil paintings have elicited various impressions from audiences – without a prescribed meaning, viewers get to participate based on what resonates personally.
Abstraction liberates artists and audiences from narrow assessments of quality.
- It’s all subjective so anyone can have an opinion
Building on the highly personal nature of interacting with abstract art, arguments persist that it comes down to individual taste and therefore “anyone can do it.”
Artists themselves also vary widely in their intentions – from Wassily Kandinsky’s symbolic use of form and colour to Cy Twombly’s lyrical scribbles to Frank Stella’s geometric Minimalism. Such diversity makes it harder to apply universal criteria.
My flowing organic forms may starkly contrast with the rigid Mondrian-esque designs also categorised as “abstract.” When standards are so expansive and mutable, abstract art risks being seen as more random happenstance than skill.
- No formal training is necessary
Since abstract art is celebrated as free expression unfettered by realism, many believe extensive learning is unnecessary to create valid works. Movements like Action Painting placed great emphasis on spontaneity and impulse rather than traditional technique.
I occasionally dripped and splashed paint whimsically reminiscent of Pollock. Some argue that innately channelling emotions into paint should be achievable for willing amateurs without the time commitment of traditional artistic training.
Without recognisable content, abstraction does lower the bar on the ability needed compared to accurately representing reality.
Counterarguments: Not Everyone Can Make Quality Abstract Art
While abstract art opens possibilities for free experimentation, creating compelling works still necessitates skill and intentionality.
There are key counterarguments against “anyone can make abstract art”:
- Understanding elements and principles of design
Imposing order through compositional techniques distinguishes celebrated abstraction from random marks.
Piet Mondrian mastered balance asymmetrically distributing bold vertical and horizontal lines framed by white space.
Mark Rothko pioneered luminosity through towering fields of saturated hues. The chaotic appearance of a Jackson Pollock painting actually subverts core tenets of emphasis and movement to dynamic effect.
Sometimes, I try carefully to modulate colours, textures and forms to simulate audiovisual sensations – discordant elements work in service of the concept.
Having control over guides like contrast, pattern and negative space requires developed aesthetic judgment – abstraction has its own internal logic.
- Knowledge of art history and contemporary styles
The most impactful abstract artists have extensive exposure to movements past and present that inform their work.
Robert Delaunay pushed Orphism and Simultanism through his studies on optics and colour.
Lee Krasner synthesised her learning from Hans Hofmann, Cubism to Futurism to develop a personal Abstract Expressionist style fusing representational and non-objective painting.
I continuously explore the Constructivists, Dadaists and Surrealists who paved the way for abstraction. Appreciating what peers worldwide are currently creating also opens up new frontiers.
Mastering abstraction means comprehending a continuum of style and technique over time. No art endures in a vacuum removed from creative landmarks before and around it.
- Technical skill with mediums and methods
While abstraction invites experimentation with materials from paint to glass to fabric, excellence requires understanding the possibilities and limitations of whatever medium is chosen.
Helen Frankenthaler innovated with soak-stain canvases, while Anish Kapoor manipulates reflective surfaces to a mesmerising effect.
I’m constantly adapting my painting based on the depth of colour, the texture of brushstrokes, viscosity of acrylic gel.
Abstraction may downgrade naturalistic aims but full realisation of a vision still relies on a confident command of tools and materials.
Unusually implementing traditional or invented techniques also allows innovation – chance elements must be handled deliberately like in Pollock’s poured line paintings.
- Communicating a coherent vision
Impactful abstract art contains purposeful ideas expressed skilfully. Movement pioneers like František Kupka investigated concepts rooted in spirituality, science and even machine aesthetics.
The improvisational appearances of Joan Mitchell or Cy Twombly paintings still align with inner sentiments.
Without the structure of storytelling or identities in realist work, abstraction challenges artists to crystallise a clear creative statement rather than get lost and meandering non-objectively.
Convincing audiences to engage intently depends deeply on wielding the elements with the consistency of motive. Abstraction rewards both adventurous impulse and wilful creative agenda in harmony.
The greatest barrier for would-be abstract artists is thus developing equal skill, knowledge and vision. But dedication to mastering technique without sacrificing inner voice passes this test to contribute enduring abstract innovations.
My Perspective as an Abstract Artist
As an abstract artist for many years refining my painting practice, I have a unique position in this debate over “Can anyone make abstract art.”
While I celebrate abstraction as a democratic art form welcoming diverse voices, true mastery demands a commitment to craft and concept:
- My art background
I’ve been drawn to abstract styles since childhood when colour and shape spoke to me more than observable reality.
Abstract art has played an integral role in my life from a young age. Driven by an innate passion, I independently continue learning about psychology, philosophy and music to infuse layered meaning into my paintings.
Abstraction has provided me freedom in both process and subject—channelling subconscious thoughts and emotions into compelling visual narratives.
Though some may gain expertise in art through academic institutions, my deep connection to abstract painting has been largely self-directed by focusing on the studio over the classroom.
I shape the trajectory of my ongoing evolution as an artist by living and breathing the questions, inspirations and mysteries intrinsic to this limitless creative realm.
- My creative process
My abstract compositions begin with concentrated internal reflection to invoke a memory or feeling before externalising it visually.
I sketch shapes and hues that symbolise sensations and record verbal associations and musical influences.
Gathering inspiration from nature primes my subconscious background processing. I make the first gestures quickly to capture the spontaneity of impulse balanced with segments of deliberate refinement for cohesion.
I step away and revisit periodically with a fresh perspective to organise, reduce and enhance the composition following principles of emphasis, balance, movement and contrast.
It’s a repetitive practice requiring patience to manifest personal experiences into a universally compelling artwork.
- My artwork
My abstract paintings offer an intimate language without words. I create for deeply personal reasons that may not translate in straightforward terms. Yet beyond my private stories, I trust in abstraction’s power to evoke unique impressions, emotions and questions for every viewer.
These works do not aim to explicitly narrate or instruct. Instead, I extend a silent invitation to project one’s own ideals, imaginations and interpretations onto the canvas. There need be no consensus or absolute meaning to validate the experience each painting provides.
For those open to discover through thoughtful observation and feeling, to listen to what these compositions whisper in realms beneath language, immense possibility unfolds.
I offer my art to engage the imaginative soul. Make of these paintings what you will.
- Why skill and practice matter
While theoretically, anyone can splash some paint in the vein of abstract expressionism, exhibiting a balance of control and abandon that draws audiences to reflect deeper requires learned refinement.
Understanding historical influences, mastering tools and media and excelling at formal composition – these practices demand years of effort even for “raw” styles.
My greatest comprehension has arisen iterating on techniques while absorbing critiques and praise to nurture a personal visual vocabulary.
For the dedicated, quality emerges by continually filtering out weaker expressions to clarify one’s full potential. It is a practice of patience and self-analysis, peeling away layers to reveal the inner vision.
By actively engaging feedback without attachment, we find over time the vocabulary to manifest our artistic intentions.
Out of openness new forms arise, each work refining until content and style align in moments of synthesis we recognise as our best. It is then the unique inner voice sings out, no longer entangled in ego but speaking fluently the language of the soul.
Dismissing the development process risks dismissing the monumental creative journeys of pioneers who progressed abstraction over mere play. Conveying what’s truly within reaches a higher calling.
Conclusion – Can Anyone Make Abstract Art?
The question “Can anyone make abstract art” has sparked debate for decades because abstraction appears to remove traditional obstacles present in representational art.
Audiences struggle to assess a mode of creativity grounded in imagination, emotion and subversion of expectations rather than observable, measurable objectives.
Yet dismissing the expertise behind acclaimed abstraction risks diminishing entire creative lineages that progressively challenge visual frontiers.
Summarising the key arguments
- Defenders of “anyone can make abstract art” claim that without external reference points, a pure invention based on feeling and impulse suffices.
- Sceptics counter that avoiding concrete content hardly precludes foundational knowledge of composition and materials plus conveying coherent conceptual statements rather than randomness.
- History shows abundant examples of pioneering abstractionists building extensively on influences and traditions during years-long honing to articulate their visions.
- Making quality abstract art proves more complex than merely unshackling from reality.
Abstract art is open to anyone
Making great abstract art requires dedication to the craft.
I celebrate abstraction’s accessibility welcoming diverse participation unlike realist art centred on mimetic prowess.
Permitting imagery free from objective constraints empowers illuminating inner Truths. However, my experience as an abstract artist cautions that skillsets and rigour still distinguish offerings with sophistication and longevity.
Appraising abstract work on its experiential impact reaches a higher bar than causally produced pieces. Great art penetrates surface perceptions to reveal timeless connections.
Aspiring abstractionists thus assume responsibility through practice for unlocking their deepest resonant expressions.
Well, this is my take on “Can anyone make abstract art” and I welcome all perspectives in this living dialogue!
What abstract art most moves or perplexes you?
Who are your favourite creatives and why?
How has learning about this discussion shifted or affirmed your relationship with abstract art?
I’m grateful for the chance to share my own outlook – let’s exchange together to approach capital ‘T’ Truth however elusive…