12 Comments

  1. Brian H. Gill
    17 April 2023 @ 4:24 am

    I enjoyed seeing (reading, actually) pareidolia from an artist’s perspective. And suspect that “a lack of basic knowledge about art” accounts for much of the sorting of visual art into “representational” and “abstract”. That, and maybe a tendency to keep categories few and simple: and that’s another topic.

    I think I saw at least two faces in the first example – and I’m not sure what creatures or objects flickered by later on – although I’m pretty sure that wall was both startled and displeased. 😉

    Thanks for writing and sharing this. And warning that pareidolia and related subjects contain many deep metaphorical rabbit holes.

    Reply

    • Suhail
      17 April 2023 @ 2:39 pm

      Thank you so much for your comment. It’s highly appreciated. I do enjoy sharing and discussing almost anything to do with art. I agree with your point about the many categories of visual art. It can be confusing to most people. In a recent blog post, I wrote about the difference between modern, abstract and contemporary art. For some people, the overlap between them could be a little difficult.

      I find it amazing how our brains can create associations and patterns from seemingly random shapes, making pareidolia a fascinating metaphorical subject.

      Thanks again for taking the time to read and share your thoughts.

      Reply

  2. Shae
    18 April 2024 @ 2:12 am

    Thanks for this article. I am a “Seer” I see a lot of images and seans in my art. I am also familiar with pareidolia a phenomenal that I have experienced as a little girl not knowing what it was. Since then I have become an Representational and Non-representational artist. I experience unexplained art on a regular basis. This journey comes with Woes but more of a “WOW!!”

    Reply

    • Suhail
      18 April 2024 @ 7:06 am

      Thank you for sharing your experiences with pareidolia and your art journey. It’s fascinating to hear how you’ve encountered this phenomenon since childhood and how it has influenced your artistic practice over time.

      Pareidolia is indeed a common human experience where we perceive familiar patterns or images in random or abstract stimuli. The “wow” moments of discovering unexpected, unexplained imagery in your art must be really exciting and inspiring.

      I’m glad this article resonated with you and your own creative journey. Embracing the unexpected and being open to the “wows” that can emerge through pareidolia and other experiential aspects of art-making is such an important part of the creative process. Please feel free to share more about how pareidolia and the “unseen” have shaped your artistic expression. I’d be interested to learn more.

      Reply

  3. Isa
    21 August 2024 @ 8:48 am

    Do people buy any of them? I have a few which I’ve seen face images on tiles and walls.

    Reply

    • Suhail
      23 August 2024 @ 9:55 am

      Thank you for your interesting comment. I guess people do buy abstract artworks that evoke pareidolia – the tendency to perceive familiar patterns like faces in random or abstract stimuli. Many collectors and art enthusiasts find these pieces intriguing precisely because they spark our innate pattern-recognition tendencies.

      Your experience of seeing face-like images on tiles and walls is a great example of everyday pareidolia. It’s fascinating how our brains are wired to find meaning and familiarity even in random textures and shapes.

      Have you ever considered photographing or sketching the faces you’ve noticed? Many artists have created works inspired by pareidolic experiences in everyday environments. It could be an interesting creative project if you’re artistically inclined.

      I’d be curious to hear more about the specific images you’ve seen. Do you find yourself actively looking for these patterns now or do they tend to jump out at you unexpectedly?

      Reply

  4. Don
    7 November 2024 @ 9:57 pm

    A great article Suhail! I saw a pink dog head too in the upper right corner of the second painting. IT is a bit abstract, but I can make it out well.

    Reply

    • Suhail
      8 November 2024 @ 8:10 pm

      Thank you so much Don for the kind words. I’m glad you enjoyed the article and were able to spot the pareidolic dog head in the second painting.

      It’s always fascinating to see what different people are able to perceive in abstract art. The ability to find familiar shapes and objects in ambiguous visual stimuli is a testament to the incredible pattern-recognition capabilities of the human brain.

      I appreciate you taking the time to share your observation – it’s a wonderful example of the playful and subjective nature of pareidolia.
      Thanks again for the feedback, I’m happy you found the post interesting.

      Reply

  5. Virginia
    20 April 2025 @ 11:45 am

    don’t know how I found this, But Thank You for sharing this fyi— my New found Images of What I was Calling it Ghost ART… In Gray tone Basically embedded in the couch canvas after I had a Meditation… Interesting How The Images got There… 5 Dimensional… I’ll explore the Brain science more…

    Reply

    • Suhail
      20 April 2025 @ 1:46 pm

      Hi Virginia
      Thank you for taking the time to read my blog and also for your comment.

      Reply

  6. Victoria Kylander
    19 July 2025 @ 9:52 pm

    As an abstract, non-representational painter I definitely feel the disconnect with people who “see” things that are not in the picture. And all I want is to connect. I can be talking to people about my paintings, where they come from, what my process is, etc. and still I get the “I see a face, a cow, or a girl” thing back at me from half of them. It drives me nuts. It feels like they’re dismissing the actual painting, and they’re also not listening. I just fail to see how the purpose of a painting is to serve someones pattern recognition ability. I have that too (though maybe less). But I don’t apply it when looking at abstract painting, or art in general! Art is about intentionality, and interpretation doesn’t mean literally making things up, right?

    You “use” pareidolia with clouds, coffee stains, for fun, for inspiration, intentionally as a creative resource. But why do viewers feel it’s ok to slap a non-existing figure into a clearly non-figurative painting, making it about something completely else? There’s such a language divide. I’m sorry, I’m still mad about it. Hopefully will move into acceptance soon.

    Reply

    • Suhail
      20 July 2025 @ 8:39 am

      Thank you so much, Victoria, for your comment and for being so open about how it feels to share non-representational art with others.
      Believe me, you’re not alone in this. I know exactly what you mean. I often receive similar comments and I accept that viewers will bring their own interpretations to what they see.

      People naturally look for patterns, it’s just how our minds work. For many, non-representational art feels unfamiliar, so finding something recognisable can make them feel more comfortable.

      Different responses are part and parcel of sharing art and are reflections of their engagement with the piece.

      Thank you again for expressing this so honestly. Non-representational art opens up unique conversations and I think every interpretation shows that people are connecting in their own way.

      I’d like to see some of your work. Please feel free to drop me an email if you’d like.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © Suhail Mitoubsi 2026. All rights reserved.